
My freshman year of college was one of the craziest times in my entire life. I would gorge myself at the cannon center, play racquetball for hours a day, visit traditional provo monuments (the Y, squaw peak (giggidy yeah!), etc), get into prank wars (which culminated in a kiddie pool in my room...ya. let's just say....ya. (see the bottom of this post if you REALLY want to know what happened in this pic)), and on top of that, go on like 10 dates a week. (...oh yeah, i would also go to class(?))
Now while my roommate resorted to spreadsheets to keep his dates organized (i tried it too...but i would never get them to move to column B, so it was just one long depressing list of random names), i on the other hand resorted to a list of qualifications that would pre-filter girls i would ask out. The list was as follows:
1. Must have text msg capabilities
2. Had to live in the same dorm complex as me (Heleman Halls)
3.Very attractive
4. Blond
5. Shallow...very shallow.
Now you may judge me or think me ridiculous; but i will defend my #5 first and then go backwards until i finally get to my point of this post (but don't hold me to that...not all my posts have points--some are quite flat. (GET IT??!) [sigh] *wipe tear...and we're moving on).
I was about to leave for 2 years on a mission to wherever. I didn't want some distraction and figured if she was shallow, then even if we fell in love, she wouldn't wait. Anyways, to make a short story long, i found a girl who was fit the mold (maybe not as "shallow" as i was looking for, per se, but she did the trick well enough) and 10 days into my mission i got my last letter from her. Mission accomplished (there is another one of those double entendras...antandras....entandras...antondros....nope. nothing. anyways...one of those)
As for the blond thing...ya, that maybe was a bit over the top.
Attractive...come on. We've gone over this already in the blog.
Same dorm complex...i had a 1990 ford manual that could die at any moment and to drive even a block was a feat. Walking made dating simple...and romantic.
Texting...this was a must. no questions about it. To have multiple ways to communicate with an individual is paramount to relationship development on many levels.
Which brings me to my reason for this post.
Recently (tonight) i came across an 'old friend,' shall we say, who doesn't have facebook, twitter, or anything (those i would associate with the 2004 version of texting...my how time flies. Remember vhs? ET is not ET on dvd or flat screen tV...at least not to me, you see.). Now while i have LONG since abandoned my list of 5 requirements (now i'm only looking for 1: must put up with me. Maybe THAT's why i'm single...i've set my expectations too high), i wonder--is this a problem to go out iwth a girl that only has 2 forms of communication: phone and face (not face as in facebook...like the real face)?
I think not.
Think about it, often, women will come across the perfect guy--except his wardrobe is atrocious. No worries. nothing his next paycheck can't fix. Or she meets prince charming with absolutely no sense of hair style. that's okay. Nothing her friend at paul mitchell can't handle.
Same goes here. No matter if she doesn't have facebook (which i REALLY cannot understand), that is a fixable problem. It is simple really, all you have to do is make her one, remember her pw, and write nasty messages to any guy that writes on her wall. Problem solved.
So worry not about technological qualifications; for the things that matter most shouldn't have to be fixed and the things that don't aren't important enough not to.
(like my hard drive that Josh Guest fried when he cannon balled into the kiddie pool SOAKING my entire computer (that is why it is in a towel in the background...))